Marketing Analysis on Google Inc Essay Example for Free

Marketing Analysis on Google Inc EssayWith the objective of To organize the worlds information and make it univers whollyy accessible and useful (Google, 2012), Google expands its personal line of credit to strive towards change state the leader of internet-related provider, in particular in Internet re look to and advertising technology. The company has expanded across the clownish and world(prenominal)ly, providing its search service in a large number of unalike languages and countries through its own unique strategy.The report starts with a discussion most the market place Google is operate in, how Google smartly manages its inter estatealisation and globalization strategy according to its own market position in different stage. Followed by the comment on whether its diversification strategy appropriate across the whole world-wide market. The report thence will evaluate this strategy mainly focus on the aspect of the say-so to damage its own brand, especi in all toldy based on the cheek of their failure expansion in the Chinese market.Then the report will look at impact for the market as Google fully enter the Android market, Googles business model in terms of reating revenue will be set forth and processed by the critique of whether the model would be sustainable in the long term. The report finally will de alright the market Google operate in and how it enters into android market will be explained in detail. Additionally, there ar some recommendations provided in terms of its sustainable development through the whole report. ? delimitate the market which Google Inc operates in? The market in which Google operates in is collaborative and interactive Google has acquired and merged with different companies, which buzz off given it a competitive edge oer other firms.It recently acquired Motorola and this brought a lot of speculation as to whether it could handle the hardware business without any prior experience or necessary skills mat ch to the case (Tangirala and Debapratim, 2012), Google had no skills in the supply chain, monitoring physical stock or achieving efficiencies. However much(prenominal) acquisitions render benefited Google because it has been able to have much secure as it nookie at a time target supple users with the naked as a jaybird hardware business. Other companies it has collaborated with are HTC and T-Mobile on implementing the Android platform. CompetitionThe environment is alike preferably competitive. Having to face giants like Apple, Microsoft and Facebook means that Google has to be exceedingly adaptable and maintain their market portion by beingness more aggressive in their merchandising strategies. (Tangirala and Debapratim, 2012), Google says that their acquisition of Motorola will be able to intensify the competition. Motorolas purchase will fully bring Google into the mobile market as they will now have hardware for their operating system Android, Also Motorola will st rengthen the patenting of Google as they have more than 17,000 patents in their name.Apple and other mobile providers major power feel threatened by this move. (Rusli and Miller, 2011) Diversification More to this, Google has non focused on its core business of being a search engine sooner it is diversifying and looking for new opportunities for growth. Google has expanded into other segments such(prenominal) as maps and Google scholar, in the communications section there is Gmail and an enterprise segment where cloud computing and Google docs are involved, social networking among others. This means that Google is not only able to reach a wider audience but that it is able to spread risks.Diversification means that in case one area of their business fails they have an alternative to rely on. (Tangirala and Debapratim, 2012) Innovation Googles survival could be attributed to its highly innovative structure. It has a culture of being innovative and an atmosphere that encourages empl oyees to bring new ideas and creativity. However, Google must keep on innovating in order to outdo their competitors and to keep at pace with the changes in the highly volatile global environment (Tangirala and Debapratim, 2012) InfrastructureTogether with all the companies that Google has acquired, they also have data centers and servers which it uses to create its web presence and to store information. These infrastructures increase reliableness and make information access faster. Google Inc had a total of 90,000 servers by 2010 and they invested heavily on technology this gives Google a good platform. Pg. 4 Some of it is virtual for event cloud computing. (Tangirala and Debapratim, 2012) ? Whats internationalization and globalization strategy? In which way Google is going?Internationalization strategy is a development strategy that enterprises want to render their products and services outside their home country, it usually reflected in the form of greater existence in differen t locations around the world. That is why internationalization also refers as international expansion (Stephen and Karin, 2002). Internationalization strategy is a development planning during the process of internationalized operation and management, which is designed to give the assistance of improving companys competitiveness and environment adaptability.Corporations have adopted this strategy view overseas market separately. They treat the markets differently due to various markets features. Globalization strategy refers to the procedures of global integration, which incorporate the international operations and markets into a united strategic entity (Stephen and Karin, 2002). Corporations that use this strategy are generally sizable multinational enterprises, they attempt to monopolize markets in their own industries. However, if using this strategy inappropriately, it is more likely to have a detrimental effect on the whole company.The merit of globalization strategy is that co mpanies can concentrate their efforts in building competitive advantages by leveraging capabilities and coordinating activities through boundaries. Which like a double-edged sword, the demerit is that it is hard to coordinate mingled with each subsidiary as well as between headquarter and subsidiaries, because each host country has their own business characteristics. According to the collected evidences Google tends to be relying on the globalization strategy.To begin with, as mentioned above, one reason for companies adopting a globalization strategy is that they want to monopolize the market in their own industry. Definitely, Google achieved this goal. In October 2011, Google accounts for 82. 4% of the worldwide desk visor search engine market share. Furthermore, in 2008, Google shifts its international marketing structure form representation offices to Research and Development center, and then to partnerships with other enterprises, which reflected that Google gradually integrat ed the competitive advantages from the compact partnership and improved its own capabilities (Ronen, 2009).In addition, Google has many RD centers worldwide. For instance, if the software was RD in Israel, this software is not only alter in Israel market, but also launched globally by using different languages. so it is clear that Google did not focus on localizing their products or services for different markets nowadays.Finally, globalization is focusing on building united competitive advantage. In order to keep its competitive edges, Google transfers and share outcomes of technology existences within various RD centers, and with alliance partnerships to connect the operation nd management activities from different counties and locations. Googles retrieval from china, impacts upon globalization plan. According to the list of info-facts (2012), China is the second most powerful country in the world. And in Flemings (2010) report, U. S. , China, and India will be the three most powerful countries in 2025. These illustrate that China is a hugely influential nation around the world. Moreover, China has more than 500 million internet users (Efrati Chao 2012), and the number is still increasing. China is a market which cannot be ignored.Googles retreat from the Chinese market has definitely impacted upon Googles overall global expansion strategy. Most of the Asian countries have strong regional relationship and China has a widely impact on them. As we all know, eastern countries are in high context cultures, but, Google is from a low context culture which is entirely different from high context culture. Their ways of dribblening a business are quite different. It seems that if Google cannot operate successfully in China, it cannot operate well in other Asian countries either, such as Japan and Korea.And this will deeply impact its global expansion strategy. As the picture (adapted from Chardonneaus slides) shown in attachment 1, Asia owns the biggest inter net market, and Googles coverage in Asia is so weak. If Google still wants to achieve its global expansion strategy, it has to come into the Asian market and first of all, Google needs to lap up the problem in China. In fact, Googles quit in China offers its competitors a good opportunity to enter into the Chinese market. After all, not all the international companies are unable to handle the operation problems in China.Since Google announced its retreat, its market share has dec withdrawd 5% and its biggest competitor in China, Baidu has increased by 50% (Powell 2010). Other internet companies like Microsoft, Sohu and Tencent where all benefit from this great opportunity which offered by Google (Powell 2010). Cultivating your competitors will obviously diminish your own benefits. More and more powerful competitors will absolutely hamper Googles global expansion. In addition, they need to keep putting efforts to the beta test before they aunch any new products into new market, espe cially in the Asian market. It needs to customize it according to different market to satisfy local consumers. As discussed above, one of the main reasons why Google failed in the Chinese market was because it did not use ICP, which is a compulsory for all websites operating in China (Zhou, 2009). ? Diversification strategy working in the international market The multi-diversification strategy is generally appropriate across the whole international market.This strategy is being used in different markets, while the only end is whether it more focus on direct-diversification or indirect-diversification that depends on the intensity of competition on the core products. Briefly, since 2004 Googles endeavor mainly focuses on encouraging innovation by bottom-up through the whole company. It acquires innovative companies to diversify into new areas or to add value to existing technologies and services (Kotelnikov, 2012). From personalized web, Google word, Website Optimizer to acquire te chnology to put up online display and banner advertisements by profaneing out DoubleClick.Followed by the direct diversification, Google, starts to expand its new product line through indirect diversification strategy. For instance, Google enters the social networking space through launching Orkut, Google Checkout then was launched as a payment gateway for online buyers and Google Chrome which is a representor of a desktop browser, see appendix one. Firstly, in the current global market, Googles diversification strategy take the development of its core products as a priority.It makes a great contribution on perfecting its core competencysearch engine, which is the most profitable product. Additionally, it also increases the reputation of innovation for Google all over the world. Multi-products line adds more determine for the consumers will become the main competitive advantages for Google in the long-term in the international market. Therefore, the benefit of diversification stra tegy is to protect current market share and attract latent customers by World of Mouth.Particularly, Google launches early nd often in small beta tests before releasing new products into the market, with many markets becoming more and more competitive as a result of new competitors from global or deregulated markets, those who innovate best will win in the in store(predicate) (Kotelnikov, 2012). Secondly, while even through the company put great efforts to add more value on its core products, the competitors also come up with substitute products, for example, Powerset from Microsoft and Search Monkey just launched by Yahoo attack the weakness of Google, providing a much flexible search engine.Google needs to add up more new product lines to create and exploit economies scope. In particular, Baidu whose market share in China is up to 78. 3%, while only 16. 7% of Googles Hong Kong Site(Baidu, 2012). Google can use its direct-diversification strategy, which pays attention on interna l growth of search engine to increase its market share in the market, which doesnt have a strong competition, such as Australia. The indirect diversification strategy should be used in the market that already has some strong competitors such as China, Korea.It is certain that the risk of this diversification strategy is there is a huge investment in the new businesses and the majority of the new businesses havent started making profit for Google. However, take current global market trend into consideration, the strategy will work in the long term in the international market. If we look closely at year 2009, revenue from ads on their sites accounted for 83% of the total.Compared to 2008, this item represented 90% of Googles total income. Nevertheless, the growth rate of these pan gravy is, so far, relatively modest (Sebastian, 2010). Thinking of Google, what product stands out? But are there too many? Is Google too ubiquitous now is an problematic question in recent years? I think that, ultimately, we do have too many products and we need to condense them, Marissa Mayer, Googles VP of Search, said Friday at the SXSWi conference in Austin (Matt McGee, 2011). According to the map of Googles product in the appendix, Google products now covered in many different fields such as search engine, social network, music, mobile system etc.But there is people say As Google Becomes More Ubiquitous, They Get More quaggy (Jeff Y, 2012) Google is taking information from almost all of your Google services (Tsukayama, 2012). It was very serious privacy issue and been intensely discussed. Google makes its money by selling yourself by sagacious where you live, what videos you like get winding, and your entire search and surfing history, Google sells targeted advertising to the tune of tens of billions of dollars per year. Selling you is 96% of Googles revenue stream. ( Anthony, 2011).Google was not obligated to pay a fine for doing so but the brand was damaged to some ex tent. Google also faces the risk from failed product or services. It comes down to having too many things going on at once. At Google, quality control is slipping. (Jeff Y, 2012). For example, Google lunched Google Buzz in February 2010, it was considered a threat to Facebook and twitter but its been shut down very soon in November 2011 by Google because of the lack of users and the late show in the market compare with twitter.The failure of Google buzz damaged not only the real money but also the trust and confidence of consumers toward the brand. (Rob, 2010) Besides, with too many successful products, customers may lose what the brand Google genuinely represents which is also a risk of brand damage. Were very apprised that our business is based on the trust of users and if damaged then thats the worst thing we could do. The new privacy director said. (Google, 2010) But will all these factors really hurt Google? The answer is uncertain.As we can see from the Googleland map in a ppendix , Googles main product is always the search engine and they use all the other products to support it. Today, with approximately 70 percent domination of the global search market, the omnipotent, omniscient, omnivorous and ubiquitous Google keeps upping the ante to stay on top of the search engine game. (Callari, 2012) Therefore some people argued that as long as people still use and trust the Google search engine, the Google brand will not be hurts seriously. Googles foray into Android market, all around impact.In this section, we will focus more on Googles capability after it has bought Motorola and ingest access to becoming one of mobile phone providers with its own Android OS. After Google has bought Motorola, there are a few implications to mention here. First of all Google will be the owner of all patents from and therefore will be of a great support for Google when their mobile phone enters the market where Apple is a dominant player (Reisinger, 2011). During the laun ch of a new phone company is most likely to be sued by their competitor arguing over the originality of the phone.Therefore after having Motorola as a patent support Google may save a lot of money in this aspect. Secondly is that Google now has a subject to create and manufacture their own mobile phone and tablet PC. The benefits of buying Motorola also extends to the field of hardware that Motorola has been in for sometimes, what Google has bought to it self is the hardware manufacturing ability, ranging from TV top recess, internet TV to internet router and live stream (Bryant, 2011). Therefore again apple will have to be careful since now Google has a potential to fight Apple not just in the field of mobile phone but also as a TV top box provider i. . Google TV (Purdy, 2011).Thirdly it is not clear that when the new Motorola, Google phone is released, it will come with the newest Android OS or not. But move to buy motorolla to gain access to manufacturing capability can really affect Googles android mobile partner. One clue to this argument is current news about Samsung, which has been Googles main Android phone provider, has announced that its mobile phone in a short future will also feature the windows operating system (The Sydney Morning Herald, 2012).Although the news said it was all about Samsung providing more variety to the consumer, but it can also be thought of an uncertainty dodging move by Samsung who capability feel an aggressive move by Google coming into the hardware market. Perhaps besides Google and Motorola as the two winners from the incident, Microsoft surprisingly might gain benefit from this incident (Wortham, 2012). This move from Google is actually what Microsoft is hoping for because besides Google, the only well know non-phone maker operating system is the windows 8 from Microsoft.The moment of changes to watch out for is the time that Googles partners feel that they are indeed competing against Google instead of having Google a s their partner (Wortham, 2012). Microsoft windows 8 here will then act as a preferable alternative operating system for those ex-Googles partners to adopt. So what will happen in short-long run for the market? In the short run it will not change much because the majority of the mobile phone relies on Android OS. Breaking off partnership with the OS they rely on is really not a good idea in the short run.Also since by law after closing the deal that Android will still remain free for another five years (Waugh, 2011). In the long run the story may be entirely different. It is expected that mobile phone manufacturers may start thinking about an alternative plan according to Googles moves. If Google still keeps its promise that buying Motorola is just for its own defense, then it is still a great idea to have such a big company as your support (Wortham, 2012). How does Google create revenue?To scrutinize the business model of Google Inc, one impressive feature in this model is that Goo gle offers free resource to the end user. Analyzing the reasons behind it, Googles philosophy is to share information universally and make it accessible globally (Google, 2012). Thus, the characteristic of free is a necessary catalyst which accelerates Google to become the largest search engine company around the world. By doing this, advertisers have become the main income rather than the end users.