Thursday, July 18, 2019
Living with Strangers Analysis
B. animate With Strangers In 2011 8,244,910 battalion were animateness in iodin of the United States most famous cities in the raw York. impertinently York has the highest population density in the United States with everyplace 27000 sight per squ be mile and it is estimated that cc languages are spoken in the city. In a city with so military personnely a(prenominal) plenty, different cultures, and languages converts may begin difficulties with ontogenesis accustomed to a city serious of strangers. The American novelist and testifyist, Siri Hustvedt, debates in the leaven lifetime With Strangers from The naked York Times, 2002, the complications and ch tout ensembleenges an urbanite must overcome in a large citys society.The main theme in the essay is the ability to show humanity in a city full of strangers. In this essay I leave alone psychoanalyse and comment on the essay Living With Strangers. By way of introduction Siri Hustvedt describes how everyone in her hometown, Minnesota, greeted when they met even though it was roundbody they did non know. The author quickly moves on to an record from when she first moved to New York. The record describes how she in her apartment is a ensure to her neighbours private actuates much(prenominal) as a heated argument and walking approximately in underwear.Even though she sees and hears these intimate moments she does non know the people around her and whence she is animateness with strangers. What Siri Hustvedt unintentionally experiences in her apartment may seem transc reverseent provided at least her apartments walls protect her from a confrontation with the people she is overhearing. These walls can non protect her in public and Siri Hustvedt finds herself in intimate contact with people she does not know In my former life, such closeness belonged exclusively to boyfri balances and family. (Ll. 6-17) To survive these transcendent experiences the New Yorkers play along the tongu eless integrity PRETEND IT ISNT HAPPENING. Siri Hustvedt tells ternary stories where either she or someone she knows has experienced the pretend-it-isnt- slip awaying fair play. The first invoice is from her friend who had sightly arrived to New York when a lady corrosion only a flimsy bathrobe entered the passenger car he was on. In a smaller city the almost naked cleaning lady would have drawn attention to herself, alone not in New York. non even when she started yelling or so her token, the New Yorkers reacted.Siri Hustvedts friend did, however, react because he was new in New York and hence had not learned the pretend-it-isnt-happening law. The second trading floor is Siri Hustvedts own from ab step forward a year ago. She was in a domesticate where a man started yelling about a very sore typesetters case for New Yorkers 9/11. He verbalise it was Gods punishment for their sins. Siri Hustvedt describes the result as uncomfortable I could bump the cold, stiff re sistance to his words among the passengers, moreover not a single one of us turned to look at him (ll. 3-35). In this story the unspoken law is very clear. If the mans averment had been said in the news or written on the Internet it would credibly have created a big and peckish discussion, solely because it was in public the unspoken law overpowers the urge to speak up. Siri Hustvedts last story happened only a couple of weeks ago from when she wrote the essay. Her husband and she were on a station waiting for a train. They sat at one end of a bench. At the other end of the bench sat a man looking like someone you should avoid.Siri Hustvedt was serious in avoiding the man for when he walked historical them he spat in their perpetration and a bit of saliva tote up Siri Hustvedt, exclusively her husband and she chose to ignore it. The tercet examples support the pretend-it-isnt-happening law. Siri Hustvedt frequently uses of adjectives makes the examples seem true to life(pr edicate) to the reader. That the stories are from Siri Hustvedts point of project gives a personal connection and consequently she makes use of ethos, which makes the reader able to disturb to Siri Hustvedt. Also the fact that the three anecdotes had happened over a period makes it relevant.So far the essay has had a minute view on the urban animation. Siri Hustvedt has by negative adjectives and adverbs, such as howling, shocked, ashamed, cold, stiff, tired, empty, hostility, and terribly, make the urban living seem lonely and at some point horrifying. In the third and terminal part of the article Siri Hustvedt discusses when and what will happen if people do not follow the pretend-it-isnt-happening law. Taking action may be viewed as courageous or only if stupid () (l. 53) this statement is once again supported my anecdotes from the urban life.The first story is by Siri Hustvedts husband who was a witness to a man be threatened on his life because he asked another man to put out his cigarette. Even though it was only a verbal attack it can have horrible consequences because, as Siri Hustvedt puts it it carries no moral insight into when to act and when not to act (ll. 72-73), you will never know when you are being attacked for not observeing the unspoken law. Siri Hustvedt moves on to relation back another story, which contrary to the earlier story has a happy ending.Her daughter, Sofie, was travel the subway when a man loud declared his love for her. Sofie is a convergence of the pretend-it-isnt-happening law and therefore she did as all the other passengers did, she ignored the man. The situation made Sofie very uncomfortable until the passenger side by side(p) to her broke the unspoken law with a witty remark. This made Sofie smack meliorate it lifted my daughter out of the recluse misery that comes from being the object of unloved attention among strangers who collectively participate in a game of erasure. (Ll. 3-95) By telling this s tory Siri Hustvedt gives a new preference to the pretend-it-isnt-happening law. The passenger chose to stop being a part of the passive audience and or else he helped the girl. By doing so the passenger does not only make Sofie feel good, notwithstanding he to a fault proves Siri Hustvedts final point, which is that, the pretend-it-isnt-happening law can also lead to something good. Siri Hustvedt finds the decision whether to act or not exciting. Out of necessity the New Yorkers often choose not to act, but when they do it opens up to another cause of a persons disposition or another worldview.In Minnesota people greet with the same sense as New Yorkers ignores others presences. Therefore it is not manageable to overcome the barrier of strangers in Minnesota, but in New York people proceed real if they do not obey the unspoken law. Siri Hustvedt begins with a negative and critical view on the urban living, but in the end Siri Hustvedt turns the negative to the compulsory and a good urban living becomes a decision for the individual New Yorkers. If you choose to overcome the barrier of strangers you will experience a presence of the people surrounding you.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.